no, it's definitely in keeping with the formula. two exclamation points, followed by three is for routine EXCELLENCE. Three exclamation points, followed by four is a subtle change to assist the reader in recognizing the magnitude of the EXCELLENCE they've just witnessed.
My mistake, and my humble apologies. I failed to see, until now, that there was an excellence-magnitude scale involved. I can't wait to see the comment when Hillary is officially out of the race. I'm sure it will be more than the 2/3 or 3/4 exclamation points measure I've seen so far.
4 comments:
I see that your comment over at Matt Yglesias (about the California/Wyoming delegate count) reads:
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS!!! FOR HILLARY!!!!
Which is not the usual formula of two exclamation points, followed by three.
Please stick to the established pattern. Thank you.
no, it's definitely in keeping with the formula. two exclamation points, followed by three is for routine EXCELLENCE. Three exclamation points, followed by four is a subtle change to assist the reader in recognizing the magnitude of the EXCELLENCE they've just witnessed.
My mistake, and my humble apologies. I failed to see, until now, that there was an excellence-magnitude scale involved. I can't wait to see the comment when Hillary is officially out of the race. I'm sure it will be more than the 2/3 or 3/4 exclamation points measure I've seen so far.
Keep up the EXCELLENT!! work.
Post a Comment